Contributing to open source software delivers a return on investment between twofold and fivefold across all forms of engagement. This is according to a new Linux Foundation report, highlighting the need for participation rather than simply relying on altruism. Organizations that merely consume open source without contributing back risk accumulating costly technical debt.
The Linux Foundation released its ROI for Open Source Software Contribution report today, based on insights from over 500 IT leaders. The research quantifies what the open source community has long understood intuitively: active contribution creates measurable economic value.
Code contributions yield the highest returns at 3.6x, followed by community contributions at 3.2x and financial contributions at 2.4x. Between 2018 and 2025, the top 100 open source contributors generated 23.2 billion dollars in benefits from a 3.9 billion dollar investment. That’s essentially a 6x return, as the report highlights. Organizations that become foundation members realize a smaller 4.8x return on their investment, although they get to influence a given technology’s development path going forward.
The cost of passive consumption
Organizations that consume open-source software without contributing, face hidden costs. When open source project roadmaps don’t align with their needs, 49 percent of respondents develop internal workarounds costing an average of 670,000 dollars annually. Maintaining private forks consumes 5,160 labor hours, or 258,000 dollars, per release cycle. It goes to show that going your own way and not giving back generally leaves everyone worse off.
“In today’s rapidly evolving technological landscape, the distinction between an organization that merely consumes open source and one that actively contributes marks the difference between stagnating and innovating,” says Chris Aniszczyk, CTO of Cloud & Infrastructure at the Linux Foundation.
Without open source, organizations would spend 3.5 million dollar on proprietary technology or writing their own code, according to the Linux Foundation research. This technical debt compounds over time and increases with scale.
Benefits beyond the balance sheet
The advantages extend past financial returns. Some 68 percent of respondents say contributing to open source makes it easier to hire and retain top talent. Product development speeds increase by 10 percent on average due to open source contributions.
Security improvements also become evident. 66 percent of organizations report that upstream maintainers respond faster to contributors’ security issues and bug reports. Additionally, 84 percent of contributors successfully influence project roadmaps more than half the time.
“This research empirically validates what the open source community has understood for years: that contribution creates real, measurable value for organizations,” said Hilary Carter, Senior Vice President of Research at the Linux Foundation.
The findings point out quite clearly that contribution isn’t simply discretionary. It’s a practical strategy for reducing long-term costs, increasing reliability, and gaining influence in shaping the technologies that underpin modern infrastructure.
Also read: ClickHouse, the open-source challenger to Snowflake and Databricks